« The Dead Simple Guide To Being a Good Manager | Main | Reflector Recap (with Lessons Learned) »

February 03, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834542cf669e20148c84d0dad970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Think .NET Reflector Is No Longer Free? You Might Be Wrong...:

Comments

Amir Chaudhry

Would love to chat about this! How do we get in touch with you?

Nordine

I used Reflector a lot to look into Microsoft's source code, it's faster than reading MSDN and more explanatory. Reflector is also priceless to understand how things are implemented (for example Linq). I will keep on using Reflector even if I have to pay $35 (even better if I get a license for free from you).

Adam Robinson

I've used Reflector for almost the entire time I've been a .NET developer (7 years now). I've found it to be an invaluable tool for figuring out where an issue is between my code and either library or third-party code. While the source code for .NET is available, with Reflector I know that I'm looking at what the code actually IS.

Ong Zhixian

This is very good tool. I think this is not a good move on Redgate's part. I remember a time when Reflector is competing against other .NET dissemblers. Maybe Redgate's move would revive those other other projects.

Csaba Gero

Reflector is totally indispensable, and for $35 it's a bargain, but getting it for free is even better :).

Christian Westman

As others have stated Reflector is a valuable developer tool and I use it ever so often. And if I where to get a licence for free I would be ever so grateful :)

I Brown

Reflector is worth $35, but it's a shame that it will no longer be free.

I feel a little uneasy about stopping existing versions from working - why not just do a final update that removes the expiry date and adds a nag screen?

Nick A

I'm in the same boat, I've used Lutz' Reflector since I first found it YEARS ago, I don't remember when to be honest. I remember watching him progressively release new versions and I love what you could (and still can) do with it. I was sad that he decided to stop supporting it but at least he made sure that someone else would continue to support it, and still for free no less. The fact that RedGate is now not only going to be charging a fee for the next version (v7) but are also going be time-bombing v6, it's like a slap in the face. If it's proven inviable to continue to support and improve on Reflector, I agree with the opinion that they should have passed the torch to someone else willing to continue to develop it or even open it up to the community. That's how they got it in the first place, so they should honor it's origins.
Let me be clear, I don't mind that they charge for their tools, if they had developed Reflector from the start for free and then decided they needed to charge for it, that'd be fine to me. But the fact is they didn't develop it, it was handed to them on a silver platter with a preexisting user base. I personally don't believe they have the right to charge for it. If they were really confident in the value their improvements add (which they claim to be the reason for the cost change), they wouldn't have felt the need to timebomb the previous version. To me it's a pretty sleazy way of doing business.
Personally, I think they should open the reflector project up to the community, I believe that would be the best thing for the tool. Baring that they should at least remove the timebomb on v6, and let their price of v7 speak for the improvements they have added. If they are really worth the 35$ for v7 over v6 people will still buy it, and lastly I think Lutz had better be getting a portion of that 35$ licencing fee.

Nick A

Did RedGate actually buy Reflector from Lutz? I remember they took over the project but didn't know that they bought it? Even the wiki article doesn't mention that.

James Randle

Fair play to them for providing it free for so long, but i wouldn't be leaving this comment if they were going to keep it free!

Jay Grieves

Nick A: Great stuff, thanks for posting your thoughts!  I have no idea what the deal with Lutz was/is, I hope he made some money off of it.  Im still seeing lots of interesting posts in the forums and cant wait to see how it all turns out.

To everyone else: Thanks for commenting, please spread the word!  Weve just about gone through the licenses Im buying and well be into the ones that Red-Gate donated anytime now.

twitter.com/anotherlab

I going to be converting a large amount old Win32 code written in Delphi over to C# and Reflector is big part of the process. I understand why Red Gate needs to charge a fair price for .NET Reflector, but I would love a free license.

Ian W

Reflector is not only a great tool for finding bugs in 3rd party software, or quirks in Microsofts implementation that I use it on a very regular basis.

Not just that, but combined with plugins like Deblector it can even be useful for debugging strange issues on machines that simply can't be setup as a dev environment.

Phillip Givens

I've been using Reflector for some time. I use it on an almost daily basis and there doesn't seem to be a competitor to it. I've heard that the new versions will have BAML support as well, which will be very usefull to me. I will miss the days that I didn't have to keep this backed up on a disk. I got so used to being able to simply download it when I needed on whichever development machine I happened to be on.

I would like very much to get one of your free copies of this product.

Eddie Velasquez

The Reflector "debacle" might be a PR issue for Red-Gate, but does any serious .NET developer not use it? I cannot count the times that I have fixed a bug or learned a cool trick or technique using it.

No matter what I will keep on using Reflector, be it that I win it (hint, hint ;-)) or purchase a copy.

Dave Meadowcroft

It is (and always has been) a great, and possibly the most useful tool in a serious .NET developers toolbox. Well worth $35. Of course being human (a human developer - is that an t for freeoxymoron?) I would like it free, but if that doesn't happen they'll be getting my $ anyway :thumbsup

Dave Meadowcroft

This damn laptop keyboard seems to move the cursor around for fun when I'm typing hence the gibberish above! Apologies

Jon Bates

All,

I can't say that I am grabbing for my pitch fork - redgate bought this tool, improved upon it and happen to owe us nothing.

It has certainly gotten me out of a number of scrapes (Ildasm anyone?), and $35 is priced very modestly.

Saying that, I wouldn't say no to a free license!

Thanks,

Jon

jbriguet

I'm a .net developer for 5 or 6 years now, and as i'm currently learning to use WPF, i can't imagine the most useful free .net tool ever being now 35$. It's not very expensive, but the fact it's free always have made the tool even simpler to use. If you want me to learn correctly WPF, you'll give me a license :p

Thanks !

Alan Dean

When RedGate took over Reflector from Lutz I discussed it with others in the community and the clear consensus was that it would end up as a paid-for product. My major concern is how often will you need to pony up? I know that v7 will have a perpetual licence but I'm guessing the v8 will require another payment and so on.

The comments to this entry are closed.

December 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Other Reading